Lawyer States How Omotosho Was Unprofessional, Biased In Nnamdi Kanu's Case https://ift.tt/by1IkPL #Issues #Biafra #Kanu #Njoku #Nnamdi #Omotosho January 29th, 2026 January 29, 2026 11:32 pmIn this write up, a legal practitioner, Njoku Jude Njoku pinpoints some fundamentals in the judgement passed against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, by Justice James Omotosho which convicted and sentenced the Biafra Republic agitation leader to life imprisonment, and in this press release the legal practitioner issued in late 2025 entitled; "24 November 2025: The Day Evidence Ceased To Matter in Nigerian Courts, Judicial Silence, Selective Justice, and Media Complicity" described Justice Omotosho as unprofessional, stating that; "the most dangerous aspect of the judgment delivered by Justice James K Omotosho, is not merely that it reached a foreordained conclusion, but that it did so by deliberately suppressing evidence he already admitted on record in his own court, thereby converting adjudication into a procedural façade, this was not an error of law or an oversight of fact; it was a calculated refusal to engage with material evidence whose evaluation would have fatally undermined the prosecution’s narrative", emphazing that; "this case is no longer about one man, it is about whether courts may openly disregard admitted evidence and still be treated as legitimate, and whether the media will continue to mask such conduct through silence, a judiciary that can ignore evidence without explanation has ceased to function as a court of law, a media that refuses to question that silence has abdicated its public duty, together, they place the rule of law itself in existential peril". #OsazuwaAkonedo

@osazuwa.akonedo

Lawyer States How Omotosho Was Unprofessional, Biased In Nnamdi Kanu's Case https://ift.tt/by1IkPL Issues Biafra Kanu Njoku Nnamdi Omotosho January 29th, 2026 January 29, 2026 11:32 pmIn this write up, a legal practitioner, Njoku Jude Njoku pinpoints some fundamentals in the judgement passed against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, by Justice James Omotosho which convicted and sentenced the Biafra Republic agitation leader to life imprisonment, and in this press release the legal practitioner issued in late 2025 entitled; "24 November 2025: The Day Evidence Ceased To Matter in Nigerian Courts, Judicial Silence, Selective Justice, and Media Complicity" described Justice Omotosho as unprofessional, stating that; "the most dangerous aspect of the judgment delivered by Justice James K Omotosho, is not merely that it reached a foreordained conclusion, but that it did so by deliberately suppressing evidence he already admitted on record in his own court, thereby converting adjudication into a procedural façade, this was not an error of law or an oversight of fact; it was a calculated refusal to engage with material evidence whose evaluation would have fatally undermined the prosecution’s narrative", emphazing that; "this case is no longer about one man, it is about whether courts may openly disregard admitted evidence and still be treated as legitimate, and whether the media will continue to mask such conduct through silence, a judiciary that can ignore evidence without explanation has ceased to function as a court of law, a media that refuses to question that silence has abdicated its public duty, together, they place the rule of law itself in existential peril". OsazuwaAkonedo

♬ original sound - osazuwa.akonedo - Osazuwa Akonedo

Lawyer States How Omotosho Was Unprofessional, Biased In Nnamdi Kanu's Case https://ift.tt/by1IkPL #Issues #Biafra #Kanu #Njoku #Nnamdi #Omotosho January 29th, 2026 January 29, 2026 11:32 pmIn this write up, a legal practitioner, Njoku Jude Njoku pinpoints some fundamentals in the judgement passed against Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, by Justice James Omotosho which convicted and sentenced the Biafra Republic agitation leader to life imprisonment, and in this press release the legal practitioner issued in late 2025 entitled; "24 November 2025: The Day Evidence Ceased To Matter in Nigerian Courts, Judicial Silence, Selective Justice, and Media Complicity" described Justice Omotosho as unprofessional, stating that; "the most dangerous aspect of the judgment delivered by Justice James K Omotosho, is not merely that it reached a foreordained conclusion, but that it did so by deliberately suppressing evidence he already admitted on record in his own court, thereby converting adjudication into a procedural façade, this was not an error of law or an oversight of fact; it was a calculated refusal to engage with material evidence whose evaluation would have fatally undermined the prosecution’s narrative", emphazing that; "this case is no longer about one man, it is about whether courts may openly disregard admitted evidence and still be treated as legitimate, and whether the media will continue to mask such conduct through silence, a judiciary that can ignore evidence without explanation has ceased to function as a court of law, a media that refuses to question that silence has abdicated its public duty, together, they place the rule of law itself in existential peril". #OsazuwaAkonedo